SYLLABUS
The LMS That Actually Listened to Teachers
After 11 weeks inside Canvas, Schoology, and Brightspace, one platform earned something rare: trust from the people who have to use it every day.
Why Every AI Tutor Fails the Same Test
Khanmigo, Synthesis, and four others promise personalized learning. None of them can explain why a student got something wrong.
A Parent's 90-Day Diary With Four Reading Apps
Epic, Raz-Plus, Hooked on Phonics, and Homer. One child. Ninety days. The results were not what the press releases suggested.
Reserve your desk before the doors open.
Reserve Your DeskNo spam. No affiliate links. Just the review.
Why This Exists
In 2023, I spent six weeks evaluating LMS options for a district of 14,000 students. The decision was worth $380,000 over three years. The best review I could find online was 800 words, published the same week the platform launched, and linked to a signup page in every other sentence.
"I needed someone who had actually sat with the gradebook for a semester, not someone who had clicked through the demo for forty minutes."
The problem isn't that edtech journalism doesn't exist. It's that the incentive structure broke it. Affiliate revenue rewards speed. Platform relationships reward access. Neither rewards the curriculum director who needs to know whether the tool still works in month four, after the onboarding team has gone home.
Syllabus exists because the gap between a press-release skim and a genuine evaluation is exactly where bad purchasing decisions live. Every review published here will have a minimum testing window, a declared conflict-of-interest policy, and a rubric that was written before the tool was opened — not after.
Affiliate-linked listicles that reviewed nothing. Press-release skims dressed as journalism. The people making six-figure decisions deserved better.
The readers this publication is written for — curriculum directors, independent tutors, parents who have watched their child spend forty minutes clicking cartoon animals without learning a syllable — deserve writing that has done the work. That is the only promise Syllabus makes.
How We Review
The rubric comes before the tool. The testing window is non-negotiable. The conflicts are declared upfront. Everything else follows from those three rules.
Minimum Testing Window
6 weeks for standalone tools. 12 weeks for LMS platforms. No exceptions — not even for launch embargoes.
Pre-Written Rubric
Every evaluation rubric is drafted and locked before the tool is opened. Criteria cannot be revised once testing begins.
Declared Conflicts
Any prior relationship with a vendor — speaking fees, free licenses, advisory roles — is disclosed in the review header, always.
Who Tests
Reviews are conducted by working practitioners: classroom teachers, curriculum coordinators, and parents with children actively using the tool.
No Affiliate Links
Syllabus earns nothing from your click-through or your purchase. The only revenue model is reader support.
Be in the first cohort of readers who get this in their inbox.
What's Coming
The editorial calendar, chalked out. Every issue is in active testing before it appears here. Nothing is listed that hasn't been started.
The LMS That Actually Listened to Teachers
LMS ReviewWhy Every AI Tutor Fails the Same Test
AI TutoringA Parent's 90-Day Diary With Four Reading Apps
Parent ReportScreen-Recording Tools for the Independent Tutor
Tutor ToolkitThe Gradebook That Doesn't Lie to Parents
Assessment* Calendar subject to revision. Testing windows are non-negotiable. Publication dates are not.
The first issue ships when the ink dries.
Reserve your desk now. You'll receive the first review the morning it publishes — and nothing else until then.
desks reserved
and counting — updated live
"The people this is written for are the ones who already know the landscape is broken. They don't need convincing — they need a publication that has done the work."